Our History

Experience that builds trust.

Leadership

Meet our teams

Careers

Join us and kick-start your career

Corporate Communications
Strategic Advisory
Crisis Communications and Issues Management
Public Affairs
Change Management
Investor Relations (IR)
Media Relations
Digital and Social Media
Employee Communications
Stakeholder Dialogue
Training

Our experience

in practice



Each project is unique in its challenge, context and team. We demonstrate how we combine strategic thinking, experience and empathy to deliver communications that truly works.

Category

PR that structures communication for a major financial event

Challenges

  • End-to-end media management for one of Poland’s most important economic events.
  • High work intensity and a large number of parallel debates.
  • Coordination of accreditations, interviews, written and photographic materials in real time.
  • End-to-end media management for one of Poland’s most important economic events.
  • High work intensity and a large number of parallel debates.
  • Coordination of accreditations, interviews, written and photographic materials in real time.
The EKF Press Office operated efficiently throughout the entire congress. Journalists had continuous access to experts, materials and up-to-date coverage of the debates. Content from the panels was quickly distributed to the media, resulting in strong visibility of the event across national and industry outlets.

The result

The EKF Press Office operated efficiently throughout the entire congress. Journalists had continuous access to experts, materials and up-to-date coverage of the debates. Content from the panels was quickly distributed to the media, resulting in strong visibility of the event across national and industry outlets.
Effective communication of a production suspension decision

Challenges

  • The project involved communicating a production suspension across three countries (Poland, Romania and Germany), requiring simultaneous engagement with all key stakeholder groups.
  • Significant reputational risk: the facility was one of the largest employers in the region.
  • Capital market pressure – potential implications for the Group’s financial performance and strategic positioning.
  • Risk of social escalation and media speculation.
  • The project involved communicating a production suspension across three countries (Poland, Romania and Germany), requiring simultaneous engagement with all key stakeholder groups.
  • Significant reputational risk: the facility was one of the largest employers in the region.
  • Capital market pressure – potential implications for the Group’s financial performance and strategic positioning.
  • Risk of social escalation and media speculation.
“Thanks to precisely planned and coordinated communication across three countries, market stability was maintained – the share price did not experience significant declines and investor reactions remained measured. Media coverage was consistent, factual and aligned with verified information, limiting speculation and emotional narratives. Employees in Romania received the information calmly and without escalation of tensions, while key stakeholder groups – from public administration and clients to business partners – were provided with clear and comprehensive explanations. The organisation maintained control over the narrative, minimising reputational risk and preserving credibility across all markets.”

The result

“Thanks to precisely planned and coordinated communication across three countries, market stability was maintained – the share price did not experience significant declines and investor reactions remained measured. Media coverage was consistent, factual and aligned with verified information, limiting speculation and emotional narratives. Employees in Romania received the information calmly and without escalation of tensions, while key stakeholder groups – from public administration and clients to business partners – were provided with clear and comprehensive explanations. The organisation maintained control over the narrative, minimising reputational risk and preserving credibility across all markets.”
Nuclear energy under scrutiny. Public Affairs in a strategic energy investment

Challenges

  • A project involving the construction of a second nuclear power plant in Poland, characterised by high political and strategic sensitivity.
  • The need to separate facts from emotions in the public debate on nuclear energy and the selection of a plant location.
  • The necessity of maintaining predictable dialogue with decision-makers, local authorities and local communities.
  • Strengthening regulatory trust and social support in post-coal regions.
  • A project involving the construction of a second nuclear power plant in Poland, characterised by high political and strategic sensitivity.
  • The need to separate facts from emotions in the public debate on nuclear energy and the selection of a plant location.
  • The necessity of maintaining predictable dialogue with decision-makers, local authorities and local communities.
  • Strengthening regulatory trust and social support in post-coal regions.
Thanks to a coherent Public Affairs strategy, the investor achieved a stable, fact-based media narrative without reputational crises. Trust among key decision-makers increased, confirmed in discussions at the government level. Information programmes translated into greater social acceptance in potential project locations. EDF is now perceived as the most prepared and transparent partner in the nuclear project. The project is ongoing, and the competitive advantage continues to grow quarter by quarter.

The result

Thanks to a coherent Public Affairs strategy, the investor achieved a stable, fact-based media narrative without reputational crises. Trust among key decision-makers increased, confirmed in discussions at the government level. Information programmes translated into greater social acceptance in potential project locations. EDF is now perceived as the most prepared and transparent partner in the nuclear project. The project is ongoing, and the competitive advantage continues to grow quarter by quarter.
Reputation under pressure: an effective strategy in crisis

Challenges

  • Increased media scrutiny of the company’s Polish operations due to a Russian minority shareholder.
  • High public sensitivity related to the war in Ukraine.
  • Risk of losing credibility and potential inclusion on sanctions lists.
  • Need for rapid, consistent communication with employees, partners, public administration and the media.
  • Increased media scrutiny of the company’s Polish operations due to a Russian minority shareholder.
  • High public sensitivity related to the war in Ukraine.
  • Risk of losing credibility and potential inclusion on sanctions lists.
  • Need for rapid, consistent communication with employees, partners, public administration and the media.
Thanks to the immediate activation of crisis response measures, the company preserved its reputation and was not subject to sanctions. Media narratives stabilised, and journalists acknowledged the company’s communication. Relationships with key partners remained stable. The company was perceived as one of the most engaged organisations supporting Ukraine. The crisis was transformed into brand reinforcement through transparency, relief initiatives and employee engagement.

The result

Thanks to the immediate activation of crisis response measures, the company preserved its reputation and was not subject to sanctions. Media narratives stabilised, and journalists acknowledged the company’s communication. Relationships with key partners remained stable. The company was perceived as one of the most engaged organisations supporting Ukraine. The crisis was transformed into brand reinforcement through transparency, relief initiatives and employee engagement.
Litigation PR for Company “A” vs. UOKiK

Challenges

  • UOKiK proceedings involving the risk of maximum penalties and allegations against the management board.
  • The need to rapidly reframe communication towards the courts and public opinion.
  • High media interest and pressure to maintain the company’s credibility.
  • Protection of reputation in a regulated and socially sensitive energy sector.
  • UOKiK proceedings involving the risk of maximum penalties and allegations against the management board.
  • The need to rapidly reframe communication towards the courts and public opinion.
  • High media interest and pressure to maintain the company’s credibility.
  • Protection of reputation in a regulated and socially sensitive energy sector.
The company’s arguments were reflected in 70% of media coverage, shifting the tone of the media narrative. Expert voices appeared in the public debate, reinforcing the company’s position. Critical commentary redirected attention towards UOKiK’s actions, weakening its message. The company maintained stakeholder trust through consistent communication, and the legal proceedings were largely concluded.

The result

The company’s arguments were reflected in 70% of media coverage, shifting the tone of the media narrative. Expert voices appeared in the public debate, reinforcing the company’s position. Critical commentary redirected attention towards UOKiK’s actions, weakening its message. The company maintained stakeholder trust through consistent communication, and the legal proceedings were largely concluded.
PR that structures communication for a major financial event

Challenges

  • End-to-end media management for one of Poland’s most important economic events.
  • High work intensity and a large number of parallel debates.
  • Coordination of accreditations, interviews, written and photographic materials in real time.

The result

The EKF Press Office operated efficiently throughout the entire congress. Journalists had continuous access to experts, materials and up-to-date coverage of the debates. Content from the panels was quickly distributed to the media, resulting in strong visibility of the event across national and industry outlets.
Effective communication of a production suspension decision

Challenges

  • The project involved communicating a production suspension across three countries (Poland, Romania and Germany), requiring simultaneous engagement with all key stakeholder groups.
  • Significant reputational risk: the facility was one of the largest employers in the region.
  • Capital market pressure – potential implications for the Group’s financial performance and strategic positioning.
  • Risk of social escalation and media speculation.

The result

“Thanks to precisely planned and coordinated communication across three countries, market stability was maintained – the share price did not experience significant declines and investor reactions remained measured. Media coverage was consistent, factual and aligned with verified information, limiting speculation and emotional narratives. Employees in Romania received the information calmly and without escalation of tensions, while key stakeholder groups – from public administration and clients to business partners – were provided with clear and comprehensive explanations. The organisation maintained control over the narrative, minimising reputational risk and preserving credibility across all markets.”
Nuclear energy under scrutiny. Public Affairs in a strategic energy investment

Challenges

  • A project involving the construction of a second nuclear power plant in Poland, characterised by high political and strategic sensitivity.
  • The need to separate facts from emotions in the public debate on nuclear energy and the selection of a plant location.
  • The necessity of maintaining predictable dialogue with decision-makers, local authorities and local communities.
  • Strengthening regulatory trust and social support in post-coal regions.

The result

Thanks to a coherent Public Affairs strategy, the investor achieved a stable, fact-based media narrative without reputational crises. Trust among key decision-makers increased, confirmed in discussions at the government level. Information programmes translated into greater social acceptance in potential project locations. EDF is now perceived as the most prepared and transparent partner in the nuclear project. The project is ongoing, and the competitive advantage continues to grow quarter by quarter.
Reputation under pressure: an effective strategy in crisis

Challenges

  • Increased media scrutiny of the company’s Polish operations due to a Russian minority shareholder.
  • High public sensitivity related to the war in Ukraine.
  • Risk of losing credibility and potential inclusion on sanctions lists.
  • Need for rapid, consistent communication with employees, partners, public administration and the media.

The result

Thanks to the immediate activation of crisis response measures, the company preserved its reputation and was not subject to sanctions. Media narratives stabilised, and journalists acknowledged the company’s communication. Relationships with key partners remained stable. The company was perceived as one of the most engaged organisations supporting Ukraine. The crisis was transformed into brand reinforcement through transparency, relief initiatives and employee engagement.
Litigation PR for Company “A” vs. UOKiK

Challenges

  • UOKiK proceedings involving the risk of maximum penalties and allegations against the management board.
  • The need to rapidly reframe communication towards the courts and public opinion.
  • High media interest and pressure to maintain the company’s credibility.
  • Protection of reputation in a regulated and socially sensitive energy sector.

The result

The company’s arguments were reflected in 70% of media coverage, shifting the tone of the media narrative. Expert voices appeared in the public debate, reinforcing the company’s position. Critical commentary redirected attention towards UOKiK’s actions, weakening its message. The company maintained stakeholder trust through consistent communication, and the legal proceedings were largely concluded.